Moderator jfk Posted August 24 Moderator Report Share Posted August 24 4 hours ago, mortenrud said: … Btw, you write “Watchmaker”, my SW is called WatchOut. Is that different? … No. Dataton WATCHOUT refers to a family of applications. Dataton WATCHOUT Production Dataton WATCHOUT Display Dataton WATCHOUT Dynamic Image Server. If you look on your drive, you will discover the executable files that starts each application are WATCHMAKER.exe (Dataton WATCHOUT Production) WATCHPOINT.exe (Dataton WATCHOUT Display) ImageServer.exe (Dataton WATCHOUT Dynamic Image Server aka DIS). i.e. the application’s ‘nickname’ is derived from its executable file name. It is only slightly shorter to write watchmaker vs WATCHOUT Production. And I suppose I could just write Production instead. I picked up the use of the nicknames many years ago from communications with Dataton development staff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mortenrud Posted August 24 Author Report Share Posted August 24 1 minute ago, jfk said: No. Dataton WATCHOUT refers to a family of applications. Dataton WATCHOUT Production Dataton WATCHOUT Display Dataton WATCHOUT Dynamic Image Server. If you look on your drive, you will discover the executable files that starts each application are WATCHMAKER.exe (Dataton WATCHOUT Production) WATCHPOINT.exe (Dataton WATCHOUT Display) ImageServer.exe (Dataton WATCHOUT Dynamic Image Server aka DIS). i.e. the application’s ‘nickname’ is derived from its executable file name. It is only slightly shorter to write watchmaker vs WATCHOUT Production. And I suppose I could just write Production instead. I picked up the use of the nicknames many years ago from communications with Dataton development staff. ahh, thanks for clarifying Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
artboy Posted August 29 Report Share Posted August 29 I think you use a total of three channels. MCTRL4K What displays are connected to other 2 channels except connected channels? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diego Marchente Posted September 6 Report Share Posted September 6 Il tuo problema risiede nel fatto che hai una risoluzione custom verticale che non è multipla di 8... se inserisci 4224x1312@50 non dovresti avere problemi a meno che il tuo convertitore da DP ad HDMI non abbia il limite del 4096 pixel orizzontali e se usi anche un'extender verifica che permetta delle Custom Edid oltre i 4096 pixel. Come datarate per il segnale sei dentro alla pixel clock massima e quindi non è un problema di larghezza di banda ma solo di una errata configurazione o di limite della timings list. Your problem is that you have a custom vertical resolution which is not a multiple of 8... if you enter 4224x1312@50 you should have no problem unless your DP to HDMI converter is limited to 4096 horizontal pixels and if also use a verify extender that allows Custom Edids beyond 4096 pixels. As datarate for the signal you are within the maximum pixel clock and therefore it is not a bandwidth problem but only a wrong configuration or limit of the timings list. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.