Jump to content

Jonas Dannert

Member
  • Posts

    939
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Jonas Dannert

  1. I have the same doubts for a W600, discussed here on the forum a couple of times earlier:

     

    (earlier post by Jim Kellner)

    http://forum.dataton.com/topic/1420-coming-back-after-3-years-need-advices/?do=findComment&comment=5693

     

    "As for those tempted to use the FirePro W600, beware, the GPU is a bit weak for WATCHOUT.

    The W600 is targeted at home video applications, not so much for DirectX 3D accelerated apps.

    If all you are doing is video playback and very little with tween tracks, no masking, no keying, etc.

    you might get away with the W600. That implies you have control of the content and its programming.   ;)".  
     
    /jonas
  2. That looks like a capable setup, similar to the setups in the Dataton lab, running these kind of files without any issues.

    All tweaked as usual, no problems. So in theory it should work well. Cannot see that the tweaking would do things worse in this scenario.

     

    Any other codec packs installed? Windows Media Center Features turned off?

     

    /jonas

  3. Dear friends, collegues, customers and partners!

     

    As some of you may have heard, am I today leaving Dataton to take up a new position

    with Barco Sweden on 19/1, as Customer Service Engineer in the Nordic countries.

     

    Want thus like to say a big thank you, to all of you that I have been privileged to have 

    contact with during my almost five years on Dataton. Time flies when you have fun!

     

    If you want to reach me, I will remain at +46-70-275 69 09 , although for a transitional period I can

    be reached at +46-73-562 31 35, my private email is jonas@dannert.se and from the 19/1

    I will also be reached at jonas.dannert@barco.com.

     

    Facebook, Skype and WATCHOUT Forum details will remain the same as before, albeit I will not be

    part of the Moderator team any longer...

     

    You are very welcome to visit me at the office on Kyrkvägen 3, Sollentuna, Stockolm, Sweden,

     if you are passing by on the way from or to Arlanda airport!

     

    I really hope we run into each other again in new contexts to come.

    For the time being , I say thank you for this time and wish you all the best for the future !

     

    kind regards

    /jonas

  4. Hi Sasami,

     

    Please see my inline comments below,

     

    /jonas

     

    I've been doing some research in this forum and in different PC forums. This topic helped me: 

    http://forum.dataton.com/topic/1512-new-watchout-display-computers-hardware-config/?hl=%2Bdisplay+%2Bcomputer

    I saw that the X79 Chipset is a bit old, do you still think this chipset is up to date to build a pro PC Display?

     

    Yes, it sure is.

     

    On the other hand Z97 is newer but not as pro, and its cheaper. I builded 2 configurations (Z97 and X99).

    Is the X99 way better?

     

    Than the Z97? Yes.

    It gives you the choice of 6- and 8-core i7 processors vs only 4-core with Z97.

     

    Any other suggestions?

     

    Thanks in advance.

     

    X99:

    CPU: Intel Core i7-5820K 3.3GHz 6-Core Processor
    CPU Cooler: Corsair H80i 77.0 CFM Liquid CPU Cooler
    Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE ATX LGA2011-3 Motherboard 
    Memory: 2 X Kingston 16GB (4 x 4GB) DDR4-2133 Memory (32gb total)
     
    16 GB is quite enough.
     
    Storage: Samsung 840 EVO 250GB 2.5" Solid State Drive (system)
    Storage: Samsung 840 EVO 250GB 2.5" Solid State Drive (Data)
    Video Card: AMD FirePro W7000 4GB Video Card
    Power Supply: Corsair 860W 80+ Platinum Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply
     
    Seems OK.
     
    Capture Card: Blackmagic Intensity Pro
     
    Or maybe a Datapath Vision AV-SDI capture card?
     
     
    Z97: Changes from above in RED:
    CPU: Intel Core i7-4790 3.6GHz Quad-Core Processor
    CPU Cooler: Corsair H80i 77.0 CFM Liquid CPU Cooler
    Motherboard: Asus Z97-DELUXE ATX LGA1150 Motherboard
    Memory: 2 X Kingston 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR3-1866 Memory (32gb total)
    Storage: Samsung 840 EVO 250GB 2.5" Solid State Drive (system)
    Storage: Samsung 840 EVO 250GB 2.5" Solid State Drive (Data)
    Video Card: AMD FirePro W7000 4GB Video Card
    Power Supply: Corsair 860W 80+ Platinum Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply
     
    Seems OK.
     
    Capture Card: Blackmagic Intensity Pro
     
    Or maybe a Datapath Vision AV-SDI capture card?
     
  5. Yes, WATCHOUT supports 4K/UHD-outputs, and has since the capable hardware been available.

     

    Currently up to 3 4K/UHD-outputs work simultaneously, on a proper hardware platform.

     

    2 4K/UHD-outputs per Display PC will give you more headroom and is recommended.

     

    A X99-based 6- or 8-core platform and a hardwarebased RAID-setup is highly recommended.

     

    /jonas

  6. It's not EDID that crashes WATCHOUT and/or the Display PC,

    but the loss of EDID or connection to the display device,

    that causes Windows to re-arrange the number of graphic card outputs.

     

    This in turn cause a WATCHOUT Display software crash.

    Even an intermittent glitch, can set this off.

     

    There's no good way for us to stop this from happening.

     

    Using software or hardware EDID Management will remedy this, however.

     

    This is distribution 101, in my opinion.

     

    /jonas

  7. ALL settings up OR down of pixel density, will be a scaling and affect the perceived output, this is natural.

    As is if you scale content, for example from 720p to 1080p in WATCHOUT.

     

    All this is done by the graphics card in the Display computer, which is, as JFK describes above, pretty dam good.

    And usually a lot better than the screens built-in scaling, which is then not used, since you feed them all natively.

     

     

    "I presume the pixel density of the stage does have an affect on the performance of the production computer"

     

    No, not really.

     

     

    "That would be why Jonas suggest a smaller stage"

     

    No, it's because then you also can make your content smaller in size pixelwise, for all the physically smaller screens vs the biggest one.

    That is if you intend all screens to behave like one, ie a circle is a circle of the same size when moving over the stage.

    Saves production time in my book. If the scaling is visible or not, will be more dependant on viewing distances, I think.

     

     

    /jonas

  8. Alexey,

     

    1. "No such interface supported", indicates that no default audio device is selected and/or has a driver installed.

    2. "However it works fine on win 7", on the same hardware as above?

    3. Please use Windows 8.1 Update 1, not Windows 8.

    4. WATCHOUT 5.5.2 was released today, can be found on our website.

     

    /jonas

×
×
  • Create New...